NPR’s Funding Crisis Wasn’t Just Politics—It Was Self-Inflicted
- richardgraves7
- Aug 9
- 5 min read
Updated: Aug 10
By Richard Graves, Aug 9, 2025

The Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) recently announced it will no longer fund PBS or NPR stations, an outcome of sweeping federal cuts that ended decades of public media support. Congress, backed by a Trump executive directive, rescinded approximately $1.1 billion in federal subsidies to CPB (White House, 2025), prompting CPB to begin winding down operations (CPB, 2025). Although NPR and PBS remain independent organizations, both have long relied on CPB grants to sustain local, especially rural, stations; many of which now face an uncertain future (Associated Press, 2025).
Before the funding cut, NPR leadership and sympathetic journalists worked to minimize its perceived impact. NPR CEO Katherine Maher repeatedly noted that federal support accounted for only about 1% of NPR’s overall budget, implying that the organization could weather the change with little difficulty (PolitiFact, 2025; Washington Post, 2025). Yet those who downplayed the consequences have since been forced to reckon with the tangible disruptions these cuts have caused.
Supporters now emphasize NPR’s educational mission and its parallels to PBS’s historic programming. However, what they often ignore, or conveniently dismiss, is NPR’s long-documented leftward drift. While some attribute this shift to anti-Trump sentiment, others see more structural ideological bias. Indeed, the 2024 Uri Berliner episode may have been a flashpoint, but the warning signs were visible as early as 2010 with the firing of Juan Williams.
On October 20, 2010, during a Fox News appearance, veteran NPR analyst Juan Williams remarked, "When I get on a plane… if I see people who are in Muslim garb… I get nervous" (Stelter, 2010). He quickly clarified that such fears should never justify discrimination, but NPR leadership determined the comment violated its standards prohibiting analysts from publicly offering personal opinions on controversial topics (Folkenflik, 2010). Then NPR President Vivian Schiller told affiliates that Williams had been repeatedly warned about expressing personal political views in public (Seelye, 2010). In a separate comment, she quipped that Williams’s feelings were "between him and his psychiatrist or his publicist," a remark she later apologized for as "thoughtless" (NPR, 2010). NPR Ombudsman Alicia Shepard criticized the handling of the termination, noting that while the policy rationale was defensible, the abrupt dismissal damaged the network’s credibility (Shepard, 2010).The firing ignited political backlash, especially among conservatives, who pointed to it as an example of progressive intolerance. Calls to defund NPR surged, with lawmakers citing the case as proof of systemic bias (Huckabee, 2010).
On April 9, 2024, Uri Berliner, a 25-year NPR veteran and senior business editor, published an essay in The Free Press claiming NPR had “coalesced around the progressive worldview” and alienated large segments of the American public (Berliner, 2024). He argued that the newsroom had lost its “open-minded spirit” and no longer reflected the nation’s political diversity. NPR suspended Berliner for five days without pay, citing his failure to obtain pre-approval for outside work (Folkenflik, 2024). In his April 17 resignation letter, Berliner described NPR as a “great American institution” that should not be defunded, but said he could not work under CEO Katherine Maher, whose public record reinforced his concerns about political bias (Grynbaum, 2024). In response, NPR announced process reforms, including expanding its Standards and Practices team and adding a 24/7 “Backstop” editor for final content review (NPR, 2024).
Criticism of NPR’s ideological tilt intensified under Katherine Maher’s leadership. Berliner himself pointed to Maher’s public statements as evidence of an entrenched progressive worldview (Berliner, 2024). Her resurfaced social media posts from prior to her tenure included calling Donald Trump “a racist” and expressing that it was “hard to be mad” about property damage during Black Lives Matter protests, framing it as a reaction to systemic injustice (New York Post, 2024). She also voiced support for racial reparations and urged white Americans to acknowledge complicity in systemic racism (CBS Austin, 2024).Conservative outlets have framed these statements as emblematic of the same ideological rigidity Berliner criticized, while mainstream coverage has noted that Maher’s dismissal of bias concerns in interviews often centered on public relations rather than substantive newsroom reform (Wall Street Journal, 2024). This context has only deepened skepticism among critics who believe NPR’s leadership, under Maher, embodies the very lack of ideological diversity the network is accused of fostering.
Both the Williams ad Berliner controversies unfolded amid accusations of ideological conformity at NPR. In each, a seasoned journalist faced swift and severe consequences; termination in Williams’s case, suspension followed by resignation in Berliner’s after making statements that challenged the prevailing internal culture (Berliner, 2024; Stelter, 2010). The difference lies in the official rationale: for Williams, NPR invoked role-specific standards restricting public political commentary (Seelye, 2010); for Berliner, the stated reason was a procedural policy violation, though the political nature of his critique made the punishment appear retaliatory (Folkenflik, 2024). In both, critics argued that NPR’s enforcement of rules was selectively applied to suppress dissent from progressive orthodoxy.
The cases of Juan Williams in 2010 and Uri Berliner in 2024 are not isolated incidents, they are markers in a pattern that has eroded public confidence in NPR’s impartiality. Both men, in different contexts and eras, challenged the prevailing political tone within the organization and were met with disciplinary action that reinforced accusations of bias. NPR’s leadership has consistently framed such measures as policy enforcement, yet the selective nature and cultural context of these decisions tell a different story.
In the end, NPR didn’t just lose funding, it lost the trust that funding depended on. For years, it could have broadened its ideological tent, embraced genuine diversity of thought, and proven itself worthy of public investment. Instead, it doubled down on a narrow, progressive worldview, sidelining dissenters like Juan Williams and Uri Berliner while dismissing criticism as partisan noise. That pattern made it easy for lawmakers to cut the cord, and for the public to shrug when they did. The truth is, NPR wasn’t defunded solely because of politics; it was defunded because it refused to live up to its own mission of serving all Americans.
Works Cited:
Associated Press. (2025, August 3). Not just Big Bird: Things to know about the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and its funding cuts. AP News. https://apnews.com
Berliner, U. (2024, April 9). I’ve been at NPR for 25 years. Here’s how we lost America’s trust. The Free Press. https://www.thefp.com/p/ive-been-at-npr-for-25-years-heres
CBS Austin. (2024, April 16). NPR CEO’s left-leaning social media posts resurface amid bias accusations.
CPB. (2025, August 1). Corporation for Public Broadcasting addresses operations following loss of federal funding. Corporation for Public Broadcasting. https://cpb.org
Folkenflik, D. (2010, October 21). NPR ends analyst’s contract after remarks on Muslims. NPR. https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=130712737
Folkenflik, D. (2024, April 16). NPR suspends senior editor Uri Berliner after critical essay. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2024/04/16/npr-suspends-uri-berliner
Grynbaum, M. M. (2024, April 17). NPR editor resigns after being suspended over critique of network. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/17/business/media/npr-uri-berliner-resigns.html
Huckabee, M. (2010, October 21). Statement on NPR’s firing of Juan Williams. Fox News. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/huckabee-npr-funding
New York Post. (2024, April 16). NPR CEO Katherine Maher’s past tweets resurface amid liberal bias accusations. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2024/04/16/npr-suspends-editor-uri-berliner-who-called-out-left-wing-bias
NPR. (2010, October 21). NPR CEO Vivian Schiller apologizes for remark about Juan Williams. NPR. https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=130722178
NPR. (2024, April 19). NPR announces newsroom changes following criticism. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2024/04/19/npr-announces-newsroom-changes
PolitiFact. (2025, August 6). Cut off federal funding for NPR. PolitiFact. https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/maga-meter-tracking-donald-trumps-2024-promises/promise/1679/cut-off-federal-funding-for-npr/article/3212/
Seelye, K. Q. (2010, October 21). NPR fires news analyst over remarks on Muslims. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/21/business/media/21npr.html
Shepard, A. (2010, October 22). Juan Williams firing handled badly. NPR Ombudsman. https://www.npr.org/sections/ombudsman/2010/10/22/130731560/juan-williams-firing-handled-badly
Stelter, B. (2010, October 21). NPR ends analyst’s contract after remarks on Muslims. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/21/business/media/21npr.html
Wall Street Journal. (2024, April 18). The continuing absurdity of National Public Radio. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-continuing-absurdity-of-national-public-radio-2f592b83
Washington Post. (2025, August 6). NPR’s Katherine Maher responds to loss of federal funding. The
WFYI. (2025, August 6). Senate approves cuts to NPR, PBS and foreign aid programs. WFYI Indianapolis Public Media. https://www.wfyi.org/news/articles/senate-approves-cuts-to-npr-pbs-and-foreign-aid-programs
White House. (2025, May 1). Ending taxpayer subsidization of biased media [Executive Order]. https://www.whitehouse.gov